Light weight Division
Printed From: Nasgaweb
Category: Nasgaweb Forums
Forum Name: A.D.
Forum Discription: This forum is for Athletic Directors to discuss issues involving running a Heavy Events competition.
URL: http://www.nasgaweb.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3913
Printed Date: 3/26/26 at 3:57pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 10.11 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Light weight Division
Posted By: McSanta
Subject: Light weight Division
Date Posted: 2/08/07 at 11:55am
|
Light weight Division is defined as 190 and under for non masters (under 40) and 200 and under for Masters. When having an open class of light weights (both masters and non masters), what definition do I use? 190 for those under 40 and 200 for those over. Unfair advantage to some one who is 40. Would it be helpful to combine the class like they do for horses - weight for age. Age Weight Of course then there is all the records stuff to worry about. ------------- Mark McVey "The work of science is to substitute facts for appearances and demonstrations for impressions." -John Ruskin |
Replies:
Posted By: wallyworld
Date Posted: 2/08/07 at 2:18pm
Written like one who is over 40! Being over 40 is an advantage how?
That would not be a problem. A 40 year old at 190 lbs is still "200 lbs and under" and any record would count! I think you've hit on a good plan for when there's not enuf' 190 & unders and Masters 200 & under to give each their separate groups!! I personally wouldn't worry about it and would just combine the 190's and 200's together. Less explaining on the entry form that way!!! |
McSanta wrote:Posted By: McSanta
Date Posted: 2/11/07 at 12:53pm
|
Leave it to me to either over think or over complicate something!
------------- Mark McVey "The work of science is to substitute facts for appearances and demonstrations for impressions." -John Ruskin |