Nasgaweb Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home » Nasgaweb Forums » General
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why have Pro level games?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Database

scottishheavyphotographs.com Old Celt Equipment

Why have Pro level games?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message
Joel Sim View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 9/26/07
Status: Offline
Points: 560
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Sim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why have Pro level games?
    Posted: 3/19/14 at 10:59am
As Utah expands our festivals & gain access to County & State Fair events we (Utah Heavy Athletics) have been looking at whether or not to take the step up to "Professional Games".

The questions that come up are;
- What would we, UHA, gain from hosting Pro's?
- What would our Festivals / Fairs gain?

The expenses & requirements to host a Pro division are pretty straight forward. Our Festival committees are looking at ROI.

The Fairs don't have a clue one way or the other. What can I sell them?

Personally, I appreciate the effort & skill Pro's display but I can't collect 1.5-3k just so I can rub shoulders w/ the "Big Boys"

This board has improved A LOT lately & discussions have been well controlled/civil.

I would sincerely appreciate everyone's feedback


Back to Top
Mike Beech View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 11/07/11
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1019
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike Beech Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 11:58am
Interested in the responses here as well.
Back to Top
Sean View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

9th Best in the World - 2010

Joined: 12/05/06
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3759
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 1:24pm
I'm curious what the pros themselves will say or even better, the ADs to the big games.
 
In my opinion, looking for an ROI is going to lead nowhere. I doubt there's any ROI for an Am games either. Heavy Events is a labour of love in pretty much all cases. Granted, so is P&D and most other things. The average festival goer is looking for atmosphere. We're part of that. But if you want to see things cleared out fast, put on a just dance comp. Or a just pipe comp. Or just heavies.
 
Your big heavies are supported by a big base in north america. You need the Am division to push up the top throwers. But you need an AD who WANTS those big throws at his games to drive a Pro games. But it's usually one guy, a huge fan, who drags the rest of the board with him and says "I want us to get the best guys here, tell everyone in the crowd we've got the best guys and we are going to go on the force of that."
 
But if your board is looking for numbers, that's going to be a hard sell.
Back to Top
McBain1975 View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1596
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote McBain1975 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 1:31pm
I have not been on this site in a while and only check in infrequently, but I wanted to address this as someone that used to run games in Michigan. I honestly can't come up with a good reason for having a pro game. They are expensive and they simply do not have the return on investment that you get with am games. Plus, the audience really doesn't care if the throwers are pro or am, they just want to see the big guys in kilts throwing the trees (those that argue otherwise, I think, are kidding themselves.) In fact, I argue the ams bring more of an audience because they tend to have family and friends in the area who come out to cheer them on (I don't have solid numbers to back this up, so this is the weakest of my arguments).
So, if I am going to run another game I have to ask myself, do I really want to spend money on pros that will not really bring me anymore in a return and the audience really doesn't care about? No.
Sorry, if this offends some of the pros, but that is my opinion and one that I see taking hold in more smaller level games. I anticipate we will see fewer and fewer pro games in the United States as time goes on, in favor of the cheaper am games. 
N�l m� ag duine le daoine.
Back to Top
Krazy40 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Stupid Track Guy

Joined: 9/12/07
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 949
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Krazy40 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 2:28pm
I agree with most of what McBain says.  If you have a small games, your ROI isn't going to be there to run a pro games.  If you want pros, go get sponsors. Go bug the local pubs, gyms, supplement stores, apparel places, etc. Don't make the festival pay for us.  For the most part, the crowd doesn't know the difference between an Am and a Pro, if they aren't on the field together.  If don't have a pro's class, GET A GOOD ANNOUNCER.  Somebody that is good on the mic will keep the crowd entertained. 

Speaking of entertainment, that is what you are paying for from Pro's.  Go to an AM event, then go to a Pro event and note the difference in the atmospheric.  The shirtless caber, the colorful socks, the toe touches, cartwheels, the high stepping, bro hugs, crowd involvement, the caber mooning,  all of it. Its always nice to have a good announcer, but when you get a group of pro's that play to the crowd well, you don't need one. 

McBain is right, the first year, AM's will bring more to the table. For one, they usually pay to be there, so that instantly helps the budget. They are usually local, so they bring family and friends to the festival.   But it usually won't get any better from there  Talk to most Pro's, and most will tell you there are people at different games that remember you from the year before. I hear the "I brought my wife/cousin/brother/friend to watch you guys"   I don't remember hearing that too much as an AM(except for the North South when it started being held in Florida).  Pro's help build the audience over time. 

Sean also makes a good point.  Heavy Athletics is only one element.  Dancers, pipers, and whatever else they do at the festivals to give people other things to do and watch.  

just some of my thoughts. 
Jeremy Gillingham

"Go Big or Go Home"
Sponsors:   

http://www.stoutbarbell.com/Home_Page.html

http://www.backinact.com/newpatients.htm
Back to Top
Nathan Parker View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar
Arnold Am........ check. Time to go Pro.

Joined: 7/12/11
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1515
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nathan Parker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 2:43pm
I've heard the argument before that the crowd doesn't know what a good throw is. This is crap. They know.

I, as an amateur have 3-4 games annually where the crowd is more a handful(mostly family/friends with a few locals). The 3-4 are big Scottish/Irish festivals. We don't draw a crowd typically. Sucks, but it's true.

If you want an ROI, then put the best our sport has to offer out on the field. They will see huge cabers turned, and huge throws. They will cheer and be entertained by it. They will then make an appointment to be there the following year. Thus growth. I assume there is an admission to attend the festivities?

Oh, and you can still have the other classes too.




Sport Kilt
JDJ Caber Company
Hylete.com
Back to Top
McBain1975 View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1596
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote McBain1975 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 2:45pm
The only thing I would really argue with in Gillingham's response is his argument of a difference in atmosphere and his assumption the pros give the crowd more entertainment. That's not the case in Michigan at least. The Michigan ams are known for putting on a hell of a show.

N�l m� ag duine le daoine.
Back to Top
jsully View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Prefers the D...

Joined: 9/13/10
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jsully Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 3:07pm
1st of all, this is a great thread.
 
 
Originally posted by McBain1975 McBain1975 wrote:

Plus, the audience really doesn't care if the throwers are pro or am, they just want to see the big guys in kilts throwing the trees (those that argue otherwise, I think, are kidding themselves.) 
 
While I would partly agree with this I don't think it's always the case. When I was in NH last year at the beer tent after the games I overheard patrons spouting out stats of the various throwers. I was highly impressed. I was surprised they didn't pull out rookie trading cards.
 
Your ROI, if you want to call if that, depends on how you sell the event. A lot of it has to do with marketing and informing the public. People want to see things go far and high. Put the Pros on the field and they'll see them go even farther and higher. The more the public is informed the more will come to see the bigger throws. The more people through the door, the more revenue you produce and also the more you can charge vendors. The more you charge vendors the less you can charge the public which creates a low-cost event to take the family to and increases attendance and so the cycle continues.
 
Look at the Celtic Classic. That games was built around Athletics and then the festival was added afterwards. It's free to the public and they get 100k+ people through the gates. Bethlehem, PA isn't exactly Las Vegas, NV yet their attendance dwarfs Vegas. Vegas just dropped their Pro class this year because they feel it doesn't bring anything to the table. One could argue a lot of things need to be changed for the Vegas games to grow and eliminating the Pro class is not one of them.
 
The people that "just want to see the big guys in kilts throwing the trees" are the people that are uninformed as to what all goes on. They don't know how the events work, they don't know the history, they don't know that the throw they just saw that looked far was actually just a few feet off of a world record. This is the stuff that enticed me when I first started going. This is why a quality announcer shouldn't be spared. I would even go to say get an announcer over a Pro class the first couple years.
 
Like Nate said, people know a big throw when they see one. You have me follow Matt Vincent on a stone throw and you'll see a difference in the crowd.
 
IMO, it all comes down to how you advertise and inform. Pros are going to do what they do best: entertain and throw really far.
 
 
Back to Top
phatmiked View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 4/13/07
Status: Offline
Points: 2321
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote phatmiked Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 3:25pm
There is a great deal that can and should be written in regards to this topic. 

The first point I will make is that no matter how high the quality of your product, if you stick it off to the side and don't market it, you will see little ROI.

Let's be candid, the vast majority of festivals are not very good at marketing and promotion.  And, ADs don't have much time to do it specifically for the Heavy Events.  Minimal payout and little support is fairly common.  Saying that you have a pro class on the festival brochure doesn't cut it. 
If the festival is looking to make money off the event, then they have to embrace the old adage, "If you want to make money, you have to spend money."

I'd be really interested to see how many festivals have or hire a marketing/promotion capability.  I believe this is an area where we in the Heavy Events could really help ourselves grow.

Jeremy makes a great point along these lines:  don't rely on the festival for all your $$.  Find a way to get out there and bring in more sponsors and promote the Heavy Events.  Even if you focus just on them, it will benefit the entire festival.

With that said, if you're not going to promote your Pro's, they won't provide much more than the Ams, or re-enactors.  So, if this is the case don't waste your money, or peoples time and energy, on bringing in pros.
Back to Top
Joel Sim View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 9/26/07
Status: Offline
Points: 560
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Sim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 5:23pm
Thank you for all the responses.

Pipers & Dancers pay through the nose to attend & compete. Thus providing a return on the expense of bringing in Judges & competition sanctioning. TBH it was disturbing how much money is thrown at & brought in by Pipers & Dancers. Just reinforces the adage "spend money to make money" as mentioned above.

Atmosphere / entertainment? I have been to a handful of Pro games(Utah back when Jeff had Vierra, Bailey & Brown coming in, Phoenix, Portland & Vegas) & I haven't ever seen Pro's interacting with a crowd any differently than Am's/Masters/Women.

I've been lucky enough to share games tents & they are normal guys imo. Half of them are pissy & stand offish, the other half are happy to be there. A few want to sell you something & the majority will offer advice when they see an opportunity. As I said, normal guys. I don't see a draw or intangible benefit along this premise of entertainment or atmosphere.

1 of the festivals does collect a gate fee, unfortunately they don't collect entry data. So we have no way to quantify the percentage that Athletics brings in. Idea just as i type this, offering a discount/coupon at the gate for coming to see the Athletics? We distribute them, $1-2 of entry?
Back on topic tho,
This festival does have advertising & marketing at it's disposal. We are trying to help them properly use the resources available. Brochures/leader board, T.V., Radio, etc.

Our second Festival does not collect a fee as it's held in a city park. 1/2 of the festival is subsidized through the City Budget. the rest is brought in from entry fees from Pipers, Dancers, Athletes & Vendors.

The 3rd festival will hold its inaugural Games this November. It will be patterned after the 2nd, with City funding & Entry fees. It will also be out of the way in Moab UT. 4-5hr car rides after a plan ride will make getting Pro's to commit difficult I'm sure.

The first Festival provides the bare minimum for a Pro division. Stewart supplements the rest as best as he can w/ Sponsors. Which leads into my next question, how can I bridge the gap between Pro's & my sponsors?

Festivals 2 & 3 are more than happy to allow us to invite Pro's but cannot justify funding so we would need to collect sponsors. Every Sponsor I've worked with to date is interested in helping the local community b/c it's the local athlete & his family/friends that will return & purchase something from the sponsor at a later date. Where Pro's, possibly only to include "rookie Pro's" due to funding, don't entertain or put back into the community any better than Am's, what is the benefit?

The Fairs are very strictly numbers driven. This, our first year at the County level, will predicate whether we are retained to entertain at the State Fair next year. My initial thought was to hold a Pro/Am. 4 Pro's & the winners of our local UHA championship. hit the ground running with Pro's from day 1. There by "showing off" our local talent, providing the crowd w/ Professional level throwing to demonstrate the difference & grow other Pro events. I want to believe that getting to the fairs & it's 100-250k+ attendance would work wonders for Pro & Am games statewide. But I'm drawn back to the numbers & sponsors. The company contracted to run the fairs wants a quantifiable return for their entertainment dollar. If I start off procuring all funding for the Pro's then I will have an incredibly steep uphill fight for future funding. We need to start off with funding.

Back to Top
Wayne Hill View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/29/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2935
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Wayne Hill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 5:29pm
Originally posted by jsully jsully wrote:

While I would partly agree with this I don't think it's always the case. When I was in NH last year at the beer tent after the games I overheard patrons spouting out stats of the various throwers. I was highly impressed. I was surprised they didn't pull out rookie trading cards.

I don't know that this is actually unique to Loon, but this is not typical. Many of our spectators are many-year repeats, who really know who and what they're seeing. They remember athletes, throws, results, and records.

On the other hand, the Celtic has athlete groupies, um, cheering sections like I haven't seen anywhere else.

-Wayne
"We may be small, but we're slow." - MIT Rugby
Back to Top
Detroitpete View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 7/30/08
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Detroitpete Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 5:51pm
I have some thoughts on this, as most people know...especially those that have solicited my advice on the issue and tangible difference between a cohort of AMs or Pros.  

I'll wait until there are more responses here before I make a post that will probably hurt some people's feelings, lol.  Wait, Hell everything I post chaps SOMEONE'S ass--we're a very sensitive lot :)
Back to Top
jsully View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Prefers the D...

Joined: 9/13/10
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jsully Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 5:58pm
Originally posted by Joel Sim Joel Sim wrote:

Our second Festival does not collect a fee as it's held in a city park. 1/2 of the festival is subsidized through the City Budget. the rest is brought in from entry fees from Pipers, Dancers, Athletes & Vendors.
 
Since there is no entry fee for customers really push the marketing for low-cost family entertainment. The first step is getting the customers in the door. When they start buying from the vendors is when it pays off.
 
The more customers through the door, the more you can charge vendors and that will give you more $ for your budget. Also, the mroe customers through the door, the more people see your sponsor's advertisements which gives them better exposure and more local people buy from them.
 
For instance, Four Peaks Brewery is a big sponsor for our games here in Phoenix. Sure, the Pro's that are leaving after the festival is gone wont' be contributing. But if the pros attract more athlets then that's more exposure for Four Peaks and more money they'll make both at the vendors and their restaurants, beer sales in stores, etc. Win win for them.
 
The first step, imo, would be to advertise the crap out of the games and really play on that "no gate fee" for customers to get them in the door and buying stuff.
 
 
 
 
Wayne, wasn't criticizing. Just saying that it was awesome hearing people talk about athletes an their numbers.
Back to Top
Joel Sim View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 9/26/07
Status: Offline
Points: 560
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Sim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 6:18pm
Marketing the Pro's to the local throwers would work. I can get behind that one, thank you Jake.
I will need to demonstrate increased entries, but w/ previous data that shouldn't be to hard. I'll crunch those numbers tonight.

Detroit Pete, please share your opinion. I'm confident that as adults we can discuss things without attacking or demeaning anyone, any group, etc.

I love how this topic has been received, with thoughtful responses & no trolls. Thank you & keep it coming please
Back to Top
Detroitpete View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 7/30/08
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Detroitpete Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 7:08pm
Ok, I'll dip my toe in the water a bit.  The idea that pros somehow bring more ams to the games is not a reality for the games at which I throw.  Maybe we have things a bit different in Michigan.  There are only a few games that include pros and they throw on different days as the ams. (except Livonia--there the ams throw early and are under a time crunch to get done before the pros need to start--only 5 events)

These games usually have 4-5 pros, where the ams typically field 2-3 classes. Unless we're volunteering to shag--because pros need someone to shag for them, most don't give a shit who was there for the pro day.  I mean, there's passing interest, but it's not like we're all running around looking for autographs. 

Pros cost.  Ams don't.  With so many festivals closing shop, I forecast more games just for ams.

The only people who really care about distances or height are on this board.  I know, we'll all have different stories to try to make our point, but the plural of anecdote is not data. As far as Gillingham's statement about pros being more entertaining...I'm in total disagreement.  And I REALLY like and respect Jeremy Gillingham.  Again, maybe Michigan is different--we have an awesome announcer in Mike Brown--he's a consistant and very fair judge too.  I look at the small number of pro games we have; the crowds; the crowd involvement; the athlete's interactions with each other and the crowd and compare that to the larger number of ams games we have, and I have to say that from my view--the ams win.

I know I could just be written off as anti-pro.  I'm not.  Go ahead and do that, but you'll miss important points.  I like many of the pros I've met.  I've learned from them--especially about working with the crowd, but just like with ams, some guys are decent fellows, other's are total ass hats.

We aren't the reason for the festivals.  Our scores don't mean jack diddlysquat to anyone but those of us who keep track of these things.  Our pro or am status doesn't mean squat to anyone except the guy paying for the entertainment.  And his pockets are getting empty.


Back to Top
McSanta View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 4/12/05
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1595
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote McSanta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 7:33pm
The issues I struggled with when taking on the Lightweight Championships is probably the same that I would have running a pro competition.  

If the games pay for the extra cost: 

(a) should the money go to support local/ regional throwers by better equipment, facilities, lower or waiving the registration, better prizes, ... more bling

+ this builds loyalty among the local/regional throwers, who when they feel are wanted entertain the crowd very well -- In an ideal situation w/ a good announcer, the crowd and throwers form a feed back loop and they feed off of each other.  

+ if AD can take pro/championship budget to upgrade equipment instead, then there is an investment into the local throwing community (but this is a dream as money would be spent elsewhere).  Example: 1st yr I hosted the LW Nationals, there was a 28lb Polanik weight for sale on track and field board that I passed on.

or 

(b) should it be paid to people who has no ties to the area 

+ paying for a pro act and big throws
+ draw in more ams (?) or better ams (?) as they want to see the pros and get advice and perhaps throw with pros (pro/am games)
+  If the games is the only one to host a pro event (or am championship), can the pros/championship be leverage as something unusual/special in P.R. and a talking point with press coverage
+ Is there a possibility to leverage the pro talent in some form of clinic to help locals?

No matter pros or no pros, a good announcer is needed to make any athletic event a useful part of the entertainment package presented to the public.


I also wrestle with the extra cost spent on athletics VS other variety of entertainment
It is the package of diverse family entertainment that the games offer that keeps people coming back year in and year out.   So would the extra cost be better spent on a sheep herding trial, a second entertainment tent, more money in family activities, history, falconry demonstration, ... hiring another another leg pipe band ( did I actually type that?)  


Part (not necessarily a major part) of my motivation of finding two other games to share the Lightweight Nationals championship was justifying the cost to the games.   I felt I could get more bang for the buck by plugging "will be returning to .... " every third year.  So justifying the cost plays a role 



Originally posted by Sean Sean wrote:

 But you need an AD who WANTS those big throws at his games to drive a Pro games. But it's usually one guy, a huge fan, who drags the rest of the board with him and says "I want us to get the best guys here, tell everyone in the crowd we've got the best guys and we are going to go on the force of that."
 

Seems to hit it on the head for me on the hard sell and passion.  if my festival had solid financing and all parts of the festival were also solid, I would seriously consider a pro event.  Solid financing and a festival that does not need improvement somewhere is a fantasy (like winning the lotto)?

Mark McVey

"The work of science is to substitute facts for appearances and demonstrations for impressions." -John Ruskin
Back to Top
Joel Sim View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 9/26/07
Status: Offline
Points: 560
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Sim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 7:40pm
Pete, Fair enough. I can respect you opinion & appreciate your POV.

How can I, we, help build the Pro division? How can the Pro division help itself & others?

As an AD of smaller festival & county games I feel responsible to help grow the Pro division just as much as the other classes. I don't foresee involvement our sport growing w/o the Pro ranks to shoot for, learn from and/or measure ourselves against.

I do believe there is something to wanting to watch the elephants in the circus. The guys who can do the outrageous stuff us mere mortals can't.

Unfortunately, I'm not a salesman. I need a lot more than my persistence, smile & charm to convince a committee to spend money on the guys I think are cool.




Back to Top
Joel Sim View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 9/26/07
Status: Offline
Points: 560
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Sim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 7:41pm
*figured out how to edit & address Pete in the above post. A mod can delete this one if so inclined.
Back to Top
Joel Sim View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 9/26/07
Status: Offline
Points: 560
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Sim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 7:49pm
A re-occuring theme seems to be investing in a Professional Announcer first. Bringing the games out of hum drum & into the crowds laps makes sense.
Back to Top
TheJeff696 View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/17/10
Location: Dover, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4599
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TheJeff696 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 8:02pm
Joel, I believe you're absolutely right. 

I've been to enough games with just Ams, masters, women and those with Pros as well and I'll say that Detroitpete's observations are accurate. Most fans don't know the difference between pros and ams and what is good and what isn't. They just love the throwing and the atmosphere. 

That being said, advocating for more just Am games because it is difficult to begin a pro class is not the direction the sport needs. Joel there IS something to watching those "elephants" do amazing tricks. The best example is sheaf and hammer. You cant tell me it's equally as entertaining watching an Am throw 26' versus a pro going 30-33' or an Am throwing 100' in LH vs a pro going 130'+. There is a noticeable difference in intensity, in the competition, and in the aura of the games. 

Also, advocating less pro games gives Ams nothing to shoot for. A lot of people do this sport to get better and better. With no next step determining world champs, national champs, state champs, etc it becomes an over glorified LARPing session. We need to strive for numbers and distances and database scores because it gives throwers more to work towards. 

I do realize my rant was slightly off topic, but Joel, I think the advice that has been given to raise the funds for a pro class are solid ideas. If you and your crew can advertise not only a good time at the festival, but an awesome athletic display of strength, coordination, and intense competition, I believe you will bring crowds. You are doing a great thing by trying to do this! Don't give up! 
Jeff Kaste



"I think there's a Squatch in these woods..."
Back to Top
McBain1975 View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1596
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote McBain1975 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 8:23pm
This whole thread reminds me when I was a competition piper. Every piper thought grade one was awesome, including grade one, but in reality, the audience just wanted to hear the pipes being played. No one but the pipers really cared about the grades.
As for any responsibility as as AD to grow the pro division, when I was an AD that never crossed my mind. I just focused on my games. Whatever game wanted pros, that was their choice and what happened to the pros didn't, and still doesn't, concern me. I couldn't care less if there was a pro class or not. And I don't care if a thrower is a pro or not. I just care if they are a good person who is fun to hang out with all day. This is a hobby, a game, for me, something that is fun. (A word of warning, I may go off topic here).
One of the reasons I left this board a while back because certain people started to suck that fun away with their concerns about spinning, pros, ams, lifting weights, taking supplements and not pissing off certain people in the sport. The big one was that this board began to remind me of when i was a piper, with certain pipers and bands looking down on pipers that they felt didn't fit their quality or vision and pipers bullying others. Those concerns that were debated on this board seemed silly over time, so i left (plus other ways of communicating with fellow throwers became available - facebook). I only recently came back and started visiting again.
(Back on topic)
In the end, just remember the only things that matter are your audience being entertained and your athletes having fun. Scores, pros, ams, whatever doesn't matter if those two are not met, and your game will quickly die.
N�l m� ag duine le daoine.
Back to Top
Joel Sim View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 9/26/07
Status: Offline
Points: 560
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Sim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 9:02pm
Thanks for your support Jeff

McBain, your previous experience on NASGA is very similar to mine. Thanks for your candor. This is my first post in years. I solicited opinions & knowledge from personal friends before starting this topic & I was hoping for different points of view & ideas. Y'all have been very helpfull. I have friends that are either Pro's or are on the verge of turning Pro or aspire to become Pro & I feel a responsibility to them. I'm the one in a position to enact change. I agree that other games aren't my concern. Thankfully I have a wonderful organization & can dedicate energy to improving the Games in our charge. One thing I can't ever imagine myself tolerating is any one division harassing another.

That brings us to a new question; How would I select Pro's? TBH, I would rely heavily upon Stewart. He has direct interaction w/ other Pro's & agrees w/ my desires to be positive representatives. However, should that mean I choose Pro's that throw huge but ignore everyone else over a Journeyman Pro that gets along w/ everyone?

This tangent is all hyperbole. When I can finally invite Pro's my budget/small festivals will likely dictate they be rookies willing to travel & compete for the sport minimum lol
Back to Top
Hapy View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/29/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1977
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Hapy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 9:38pm
How about just eliminating the am/pro distinction? Put what budget you can into prize money, and whomever registers/shows up (if invited) wins it?  This system seems to work fairly well in Scotland?


Real Men Wear Purple

Tinky Winky Throw Far!

Central Vermont Strength Association
Back to Top
jsully View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Prefers the D...

Joined: 9/13/10
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jsully Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 11:33pm
I think pros putting on a clinic for the ams is a great idea and could generate more $ to go towards having a pro class.

Also, doesn't Scotland have a "local" and "open" class where local is similar to ams and open is their pro division?
Back to Top
jsully View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

Prefers the D...

Joined: 9/13/10
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jsully Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/19/14 at 11:35pm
Also, by eliminating the distinction or pro/am I think it will discourage the growth of our sport. Nobody is going to want to keep competing if their first time throwing is against a pro. It's hard enough to convince someone that they won't look like a jackass throwing the 56 for the first time. Lol
Back to Top
Krazy40 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar
Stupid Track Guy

Joined: 9/12/07
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 949
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Krazy40 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/20/14 at 5:15am
I enjoy throwing in MI.  I went up there many times as an AM.  I met most of that Michigan crew at lake-less Fife Like my first year throwing. As a Pro, I go up there 4 times a year, far more then anywhere else.   I can see why you guys have a different view then most about the entertainment value of the Pro's: You guys have the "great announcer" thing covered pretty much everywhere you go.  Frank and Mike are amazing on the Mic.  They get it, they know how to work the crowd.  That is were your entertainment value is. 

Jeremy Gillingham

"Go Big or Go Home"
Sponsors:   

http://www.stoutbarbell.com/Home_Page.html

http://www.backinact.com/newpatients.htm
Back to Top
Wayne Hill View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 8/29/04
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2935
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Wayne Hill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/20/14 at 6:25am
Originally posted by jsully jsully wrote:

Wayne, wasn't criticizing. Just saying that it was awesome hearing people talk about athletes an their numbers.
Oh, goodness, not taken as criticism at all. I'd actually be interested in feedback from others about whether they see this elsewhere. I haven't seen it.
"We may be small, but we're slow." - MIT Rugby
Back to Top
greynolds177 View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic
Avatar

Joined: 4/12/07
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1752
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote greynolds177 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/20/14 at 6:43am

Very interesting thread and some great questions from Joel.

What would we, UHA, gain from hosting Pro's?
UHA has most to gain from hosting Pro's "if" a training camp could be organised to enable folk to get technique coaching from the vey best. I had the pleasure of watching Ryan Vierra conducting a camp - Pro coaching is of more lasting value - than Pro spectating
 
What would our Festivals / Fairs gain?
Honestly? The right to think that it matters to the customer. There is no evidence to suggest that it does. It could be argued that the only people who might be interested are members of this site. Your Festival Committees are 100% correct to be asking the hard ROI questions.

The Fairs don't have a clue one way or the other. What can I sell them?
You can sell them a Highland Games Show. An exciting demonstration of Scotland's original extreme sport with the opportunity for their spectators to get photographed with the equipment. You can remind them that "Outlander" is going to hit the TV screens and interest in Scotland is going to soar! There is so much that you can sell them including great pics for their PR volunteer!
 
Comment
While I love seeing the Pros in action as a Highland Games fan - as an AD - the bottom line dictates how much I can put into the Inverness Prize Fund. Ultimately I think that the Fairs that you come into contact with will have a bottom line which will dictate how much that they can spend on bringing in the very best athletes. Because the pro Championships are currently a shambolic mess - we cannot expect the Pros to generate the media and spectator interest that their talent deserves. When Donald Dinnie threw in the USA he attracted thousands of spectators. If he were alive today - he wouldn't.
A.D.Inverness 1999-present; MWC2006, World Championships 2007, MWC2009 and MWC2014. Organiser of Guinness World Record for Caber Tossing. Scottish Masters International Hall of Fame Inductee 2014.
Back to Top
Sean Betz View Drop Down
Postaholic
Postaholic

World Champ - ’08

Joined: 9/09/04
Status: Offline
Points: 1036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Betz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/20/14 at 6:47am
I think is a very good discussion.  I really agree with alot of what has been said.  Jake has hit alot of the issues that the pros deal with.  If it is a games that already has 10+ classes all throwing at the same time it makes no sense to add a pro class.  It completely confuses anyone watching.  If your throwing in a pasture or field that is completely away from the festival it makes no sense to have pros.  If you have an announcer that isn't willing to know the records or bio's and get the crowd involved then it makes no sense to have pros. 
 
After Karl Dodge retired from throwing in 1999-2000,  the pro division started dying off in the RMSA.  Then soon after that  the Estes Park games started going downhill, when it kicked out the RMSA and depleted the pros.  3 years ago I was asked to help with it.  We added the RMSA back into it, with more pros, and more events with more money.  All of a sudden there is more throwers popping up in the Colorado area that are motivated to throw far, and a ton of people have come back to watch the athletics again(good weather helps too).  Estes has the budget to do it.  Not all games do.  I respect the fact that the president of the festival wanted to do more and get the athletics to what it used to be. 
 
Hapy is right about Scotland. It is an honor to be able to compete at one of their games.  The people watching know the athletes throwing are trained at what they do.  They get sponsors every year and it's usually a local class and an open class.  The states have turned the games into a throwing powerlifting meet and that's fine.   We need some of those comps to get more involved.  In some ways it does water down what heavy athletics is.  I realize their are some that just want to tell their friends and families that they are a highland games athlete, and in some cases it's only because they are willing to pay an entry fee and get a kilt.  Is this representing a scottish heavy athlete? Who wants to watch that.  There are pro's that are all about themselves and hate am's.  I can't stand that either.  It's really hard to mix these two together.  
Back to Top
C. Smith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 8/30/04
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 6661443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote C. Smith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3/20/14 at 7:02am
Originally posted by Sean Sean wrote:

In my opinion, looking for an ROI is going to lead nowhere. I doubt there's any ROI for an Am games either. Heavy Events is a labour of love in pretty much all cases. Granted, so is P&D and most other things. The average festival goer is looking for atmosphere. We're part of that. But if you want to see things cleared out fast, put on a just dance comp. Or a just pipe comp. Or just heavies.


This.


Originally posted by Nathan Parker Nathan Parker wrote:

I've heard the argument before that the crowd doesn't know what a good throw is. This is crap. They know.


100% this.  Anyone can see the difference between someone stumbling to throw the hwfd 20' and someone else going 40'+.  Especially if they are on the field at the same time.  

 
Originally posted by McBain1975 McBain1975 wrote:

The only thing I would really argue with in Gillingham's response is his argument of a difference in atmosphere and his assumption the pros give the crowd more entertainment. That's not the case in Michigan at least. The Michigan ams are known for putting on a hell of a show.


I'd be surprised if the Am's in Alma get the response we do.  I hope they do, that would be awesome, but I'd be surprised.  We get asked to take pictures every year, talk to many of the same folks every year, and have even had someone bring back a poster that they blew up the next year to have 4 of us Pros sign it.  And this is not exclusive to Alma either, many comps have had the same people come back to cheer for particular athletes every year.  I believe it was Gillingham who indicated that people had asked about Ko and I the year we stopped going to Chicago.  Again, I hope that happens in the Am's, but it never did when I was an Am. 

 
Originally posted by Detroitpete Detroitpete wrote:


These games usually have 4-5 pros, where the ams typically field 2-3 classes. Unless we're volunteering to shag--because pros need someone to shag for them, most don't give a shit who was there for the pro day.


I can only speak for myself and maybe a few others, but when I was coming up this mattered.  I wanted to watch and talk to the big dogs so that I could improve as a thrower.  I understand a lot of Ams care much less about the competition aspect and just want to hang out and have some beers with friends, but there are also a lot of Ams who have a goal to throw farther and move up the ranks.  Both are fantastic reasons to be involved in Highland Games, lets just not paint everyone with the same brush. 

Originally posted by Detroitpete Detroitpete wrote:


The only people who really care about distances or height are on this board.


I agree wholeheartedly with this. 


Originally posted by Hapy Hapy wrote:

How about just eliminating the am/pro distinction? Put what budget you can into prize money, and whomever registers/shows up (if invited) wins it?  This system seems to work fairly well in Scotland?


Please, please, please, this.  I've been in favor of this since...forever.

Originally posted by Wayne Hill Wayne Hill wrote:

Oh, goodness, not taken as criticism at all. I'd actually be interested in feedback from others about whether they see this elsewhere. I haven't seen it.


I have.  Not everywhere, but certainly in several places.  


Also, +1 to the announcing, sponsors, and marketing, as noted above.  
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.11
Copyright ©2001-2012 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.066 seconds.